Friday, July 15, 2005

John Locke Foundation Promotes Climate Fiction

The folks at Raleigh's John Locke Foundation apparently have given up on sticking to the facts in the debate over manmade climate change, as they're peddling a flat-out fictional account of the problem to the North Carolina General Assembly.

As the state House and Senate confer over a measure creating a state commission on climate change, the conservative pro-business think tank, which receives funds from fossil-fuel interests, is distributing to all lawmakers copies of Michael Crichton's novel State of Fear, a thriller in which scientific debate over global warming serves as a backdrop for romance and political intrigue.

While most scientific organizations warn that manmade climate change is a very real danger, Crichton in a statement on his Web site derides their viewpoint as politicized. In fact, he compares them to the early 20th century U.S. eugenics movement.

"I am not arguing that global warming is the same as eugenics," Crichton writes. "But the similarities are not superficial."

Crichton's novel draws on the work of Dr. S. Fred Singer, a climatologist and global warming skeptic whose Arlington, Va.-based Science & Environmental Policy Project receives funding from greenhouse gas polluter extraordinaire Exxon Mobil. Incidentally, the John Locke Foundation this week hosted Singer for a luncheon speaking event.

Science-based environmental organizations such as Environmental Defense have criticized Crichton's novel for demonstrating an incomplete understanding of technical issues and for giving short shrift to the large body of evidence and analysis supporting the seriousness of the climate-change problem we face.

"Wittingly or not, he is prone to selective use of data, indiscriminate acceptance of dubious sources and just plain errors of fact," according to ED's analysis of the novel.

Let's hope N.C. lawmakers are able to separate fact from fiction while enjoying a little summer pulp fiction.

3 Comments:

At Tuesday, July 19, 2005 6:27:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

lets keep an eye on this bill and make sure it gets to the Governor's office and he signs it.

 
At Friday, August 31, 2007 1:14:00 AM, Blogger Bob said...

Sue, check out Paul Watson's article on prisonplanet.com "Definitive Proof: Majority Of Scientists Do Not Support Man Made Warming Theory" Who is behind the "Energy and Environment" journal and who is "(medical)Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte" who has supposedly debunked global warming? Martin Durkin who produced "The Great Global Warming Swindle" talks about "that bit of the atmosphere up there called the troposphere", perhaps he meant the tropopause, if he knew anything about atmospheric science he would not have made the mistake ... I want to write a rebuttle to Paul Watson so any info would be welcome ... Robert paperbark@gmail.com

 
At Friday, August 31, 2007 10:14:00 AM, Blogger Sue Sturgis said...

Bob, I don't know much about Klaus-Martin Schulte (other than the fact that he's a medical researcher, not a climatologist), but I would point you to the entry for the journal Energy and Environment from Sourcewatch.org, a project of the Center for Media and Democracy:

The journal Energy and Environment is a social science journal published by Multi-Science. The journal's editor is Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, a reader in geography at the University of Hull in England and climate skeptic.

Energy and Environment is not carried in the ISI listing of peer-reviewed journals. Its peer review process has been widely criticised for allowing the publication of substandard papers ... Numerous climate skeptics and contrarians have published in the journal and these studies have later been quoted by Republican critics of global warming science such as Senator James Inhofe and Congressman Joe Barton...

People who have published in this journal include Sallie Baliunas, Patrick Michaels, Ross McKitrick, Stephen McIntyre, Ian Castles, Roger Pielke Jr., Willie Soon, Madhav Khandekar and Indur Goklany.


Personally, I wouldn't waste much time trying to reach Paul Watson and the folks at Prison Planet/Infowars. While they do perform a useful service on occasion by highlighting some important stories that the corporate media ignores or underplays, they are strongly ideologically driven and deeply invested in promoting climate skepticism as part of a broader political agenda. I don't think they're going to be particularly receptive to your climate skepticism skepticism.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home